{
  "id": 2538341,
  "name": "MARGARET Y. BISHOP, Petitioner-Appellee v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, O'BERRY CENTER, Respondent-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bishop v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources",
  "decision_date": "1991-03-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 465PA90",
  "first_page": "325",
  "last_page": "325",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 N.C. 325"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "394 S.E.2d 702",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1990,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "100 N.C. App. 175",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8526479
      ],
      "year": 1990,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/100/0175-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 875,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.747,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08193257599188215
    },
    "sha256": "1b9a3c050a0f001dc264c91280312b9afe71b1f6efac4f6b0f7399261db60816",
    "simhash": "1:b8b3763474bd64fd",
    "word_count": 124
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:40.693084+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MARGARET Y. BISHOP, Petitioner-Appellee v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, O\u2019BERRY CENTER, Respondent-Appellant"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nHaving reviewed the record and briefs and heard argument, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review filed by the North Carolina Department of Human Resources, O\u2019Berry Center, was improvidently allowed.\nDiscretionary review improvidently allowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eastern Carolina Legal Services, Inc., by Wesley Abney, for petitioner-appellee.",
      "Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Valerie B. Spalding, Associate Attorney General, for respondent-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARGARET Y. BISHOP, Petitioner-Appellee v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, O\u2019BERRY CENTER, Respondent-Appellant\nNo. 465PA90\n(Filed 7 March 1991)\nON discretionary review of a unanimous decision by the Court of Appeals, 100 N.C. App. 175, 394 S.E.2d 702 (1990), affirming an order entered 12 May 1989 by Phillips, J., in Superior Court, Wayne County. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 February 1991.\nEastern Carolina Legal Services, Inc., by Wesley Abney, for petitioner-appellee.\nLacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Valerie B. Spalding, Associate Attorney General, for respondent-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0325-01",
  "first_page_order": 359,
  "last_page_order": 359
}