{
  "id": 2543859,
  "name": "ROY DUDLEY SMITH v. JAMES ALBERT BOHLEN and BETTY LOU HOLMQUIST BOHLEN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Bohlen",
  "decision_date": "1991-04-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 410A89",
  "first_page": "564",
  "last_page": "564",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 N.C. 564"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "382 S.E.2d 812",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "95 N.C. App. 347",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8520730
      ],
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/95/0347-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 655,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.748,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08198894993491898
    },
    "sha256": "629aa277b1b9b7d24ee775d699760b38e5cf658ceb26e4f0e423bb46d7621a75",
    "simhash": "1:c4aa17e8f07b87bd",
    "word_count": 106
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:40.693084+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROY DUDLEY SMITH v. JAMES ALBERT BOHLEN and BETTY LOU HOLMQUIST BOHLEN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Smith, Patterson, Foll\u00edn, Curtis, James, Harkavy & Lawrence, by Michael F. Curtis, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Frazier, Frazier & Mahler, by Robert A. Franklin and James D. McKinney, for defendant-appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROY DUDLEY SMITH v. JAMES ALBERT BOHLEN and BETTY LOU HOLMQUIST BOHLEN\nNo. 410A89\n(Filed 3 April 1991)\nAppeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30 from a decision by a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 95 N.C. App. 347, 382 S.E.2d 812 (1989), finding no error in the judgment and verdict entered by Morgan, J., at the 11 April 1988 Session of Superior Court, GUILFORD County. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 March 1990.\nSmith, Patterson, Foll\u00edn, Curtis, James, Harkavy & Lawrence, by Michael F. Curtis, for plaintiff-appellant.\nFrazier, Frazier & Mahler, by Robert A. Franklin and James D. McKinney, for defendant-appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0564-01",
  "first_page_order": 598,
  "last_page_order": 598
}