{
  "id": 2540949,
  "name": "NORMAN L. POLK v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Polk v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1991-05-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 287PA90",
  "first_page": "730",
  "last_page": "730",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "328 N.C. 730"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "210 S.E.2d 260",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "286 N.C. 331",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8565452
      ],
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/286/0331-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1337,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.739,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08195941153325928
    },
    "sha256": "56d600bad5e74f52354b6d64e004f82cdbe6492c10132da117bcea7f68969149",
    "simhash": "1:df37357413a1d0ee",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:40.693084+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NORMAN L. POLK v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nChief Justice Exum took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of this Court were equally divided with three members voting to affirm the decision of the Superior Court and three members voting to reverse. Therefore, the decision of the Superior Court is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E.2d 260 (1974).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Connor, Bunn, Rogerson & Woodard, P.A., by James F. Roger-son, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "Poyner & Spruill, by George L. Simpson, III, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NORMAN L. POLK v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY\nNo. 287PA90\n(Filed 2 May 1991)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 551 (NCI4th)\u2014 evenly divided Court \u2014decision affirmed without precedential value\nWhere one member of the Supreme Court did not participate in the consideration or decision of a case and the remaining six justices are equally divided, the decision of the superior court is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.\nAm Jur 2d, Appeal and Error \u00a7 902.\nON discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 prior to a determination by the Court of Appeals of summary judgment for plaintiff entered by Grant, J., at the 21 May 1990 Session of Superior Court, EDGECOMBE County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 November 1990.\nConnor, Bunn, Rogerson & Woodard, P.A., by James F. Roger-son, for plaintiff-appellee.\nPoyner & Spruill, by George L. Simpson, III, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0730-01",
  "first_page_order": 764,
  "last_page_order": 764
}