{
  "id": 11276023,
  "name": "NATHANIEL TAYLOR vs. JONAS AND WILLIAM SPIVEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Taylor v. Spivey",
  "decision_date": "1850-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "427",
  "last_page": "427",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "11 Ired. 427"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "33 N.C. 427"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 975,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.501,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.916138033315254e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5359397401161226
    },
    "sha256": "e5a14bd7a597347fb3ff2a3b65657dc53f9095354fbcacdb0cf393fd44d90ee7",
    "simhash": "1:4bf8dfa899e59db8",
    "word_count": 162
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:44:04.070595+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NATHANIEL TAYLOR vs. JONAS AND WILLIAM SPIVEY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peabsoit, J.\nThis was a warrant on a former judgment of a single justice. The defendants relied on the statute of limitations. The plaintiffs in the replication alleged a' new promise within the seven years. His Honor correctly decided, that the statute could not thus be met. The replication of a new promise is confined to actions \u2018on promises.\u201d This is settled in this State and England.\nThe other instructions were uncalled for; at all events the plaintiffhas no right to complain of them.\nPer Curiam, Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peabsoit, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jordan, for the plaintiff.",
      "A. Moore, for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NATHANIEL TAYLOR vs. JONAS AND WILLIAM SPIVEY.\nWhere to an action on a justice\u2019s judgment the defendant pleads \u201cthe statute of limitations,' \u2019 the plaintiff cannot reply a new promise within the seven years. The replication of a new promise is confined to actions \"on promises.\u201d\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Law of Gates County, at the Fall Term 1850, his Honor Judge Caldwell presiding.\nJordan, for the plaintiff.\nA. Moore, for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0427-01",
  "first_page_order": 447,
  "last_page_order": 447
}