{
  "id": 2511911,
  "name": "STATE v. FAISON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Faison",
  "decision_date": "1992-01-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 521PA91",
  "first_page": "614",
  "last_page": "614",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "330 N.C. 614"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "104 N.C.App. 554",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 343,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "sha256": "e964414440ad9d13b5d82756e2d6cce35f17b6ab468470493ddaad920e77dc08",
    "simhash": "1:c9680443fe70f711",
    "word_count": 53
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:55:04.423674+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. FAISON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas allowed 9 January 1992. Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 9 January 1992. Petition by defendanti for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 9 January 1992.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. FAISON\nNo. 521PA91\nCase below: 104 N.C.App. 554"
  },
  "file_name": "0614-05",
  "first_page_order": 642,
  "last_page_order": 642
}