{
  "id": 2496909,
  "name": "DOZIER v. CRANDALL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dozier v. Crandall",
  "decision_date": "1992-03-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 54PA92",
  "first_page": "116",
  "last_page": "116",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "331 N.C. 116"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "105 N.C.App. 74",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8521275
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/105/0074-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 24,
    "char_count": 150,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.663,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.081458996258083
    },
    "sha256": "9b4fd4008cc5092c81d5e69e36d52d48288daea3e96a31524230f8e71055d084",
    "simhash": "1:898368edce312a61",
    "word_count": 24
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:05:46.767853+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DOZIER v. CRANDALL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 March 1992.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DOZIER v. CRANDALL\nNo. 54PA92\nCase below: 105 N.C.App. 74"
  },
  "file_name": "0116-03",
  "first_page_order": 158,
  "last_page_order": 158
}