{
  "id": 2499777,
  "name": "STATE v. VEST",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Vest",
  "decision_date": "1992-03-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 033P92",
  "first_page": "121",
  "last_page": "121",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "331 N.C. 121"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "104 N.C.App. 771",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524227
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/104/0771-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 260,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.779,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08149490568755167
    },
    "sha256": "daae647da46629c32ac4437eb06944758a943657e551d62845e01b2febba4d5e",
    "simhash": "1:eab99c4fdb20f408",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:05:46.767853+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. VEST"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 March 1992. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 March 1992.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. VEST\nNo. 033P92\nCase below: 104 N.C.App. 771"
  },
  "file_name": "0121-03",
  "first_page_order": 163,
  "last_page_order": 163
}