{
  "id": 2497412,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION; THE PUBLIC STAFF-NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION (Intervenors), METRO MOBILE CTS OF CHARLOTTE, INC.; GTE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED; CONTEL CELLULAR CORPORATION; G.M.D. PARTNERSHIP; BLUE RIDGE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; CENTEL CELLULAR COMPANY; N.C. RSA 2 CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; N.C. RSA 3 CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; CELLCOM OF HICKORY, INC.; ALLTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION (Joint Petitioners); CAROLINA TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY; EASTERN RADIO SERVICE, INC.; AND N.C. CELLULAR ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL LACY H. THORNBURG (Intervenor)",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Thornburg",
  "decision_date": "1992-04-23",
  "docket_number": "No. 103PA92",
  "first_page": "282",
  "last_page": "283",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "331 N.C. 282"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1366,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.711,
    "sha256": "26d9939ceecd33bbf0e13cb64966eed818f8dd2c9b5bc3ecccee9b023f0c0b16",
    "simhash": "1:3561f0b539cf93bc",
    "word_count": 204
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:05:46.767853+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION; THE PUBLIC STAFF-NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION (Intervenors), METRO MOBILE CTS OF CHARLOTTE, INC.; GTE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED; CONTEL CELLULAR CORPORATION; G.M.D. PARTNERSHIP; BLUE RIDGE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; CENTEL CELLULAR COMPANY; N.C. RSA 2 CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; N.C. RSA 3 CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; CELLCOM OF HICKORY, INC.; ALLTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION (Joint Petitioners); CAROLINA TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY; EASTERN RADIO SERVICE, INC.; AND N.C. CELLULAR ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL LACY H. THORNBURG (Intervenor)"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nBY its order dated 21 April 1992 allowing plaintiffs\u2019 petition for writ of certiorari, the Court determined only to review the question whether the Court of Appeals\u2019 decision made 12 March 1992 to issue its writ of supersedeas should be affirmed or reversed. The Court will consider and determine this question based on the materials contained in and attached to the plaintiffs\u2019 petition and the defendant\u2019s response filed with this Court. Pending further orders of this Court, the writ of supersedeas issued by the Court of Appeals shall remain in full force and effect.\nDone by the Court in Conference this the 23rd day of April 1992.\nLake, J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Lake, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION; THE PUBLIC STAFF-NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION (Intervenors), METRO MOBILE CTS OF CHARLOTTE, INC.; GTE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED; CONTEL CELLULAR CORPORATION; G.M.D. PARTNERSHIP; BLUE RIDGE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; CENTEL CELLULAR COMPANY; N.C. RSA 2 CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; N.C. RSA 3 CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY; CELLCOM OF HICKORY, INC.; ALLTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION (Joint Petitioners); CAROLINA TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY; EASTERN RADIO SERVICE, INC.; AND N.C. CELLULAR ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL LACY H. THORNBURG (Intervenor)\nNo. 103PA92\n(Filed 23 April 1992)"
  },
  "file_name": "0282-01",
  "first_page_order": 324,
  "last_page_order": 325
}