{
  "id": 2501537,
  "name": "RUTLEDGE v. STROH COMPANIES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rutledge v. Stroh Co.",
  "decision_date": "1992-05-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 131P92",
  "first_page": "384",
  "last_page": "384",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "331 N.C. 384"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "105 N.C.App. 307",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8522777
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/105/0307-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 25,
    "char_count": 158,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.754,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0815084199889646
    },
    "sha256": "d28ba5bd5af69070aa2db83d9763d4d31371c296698e12685c2fb97c77669d19",
    "simhash": "1:85bea4f648b1726e",
    "word_count": 25
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:05:46.767853+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RUTLEDGE v. STROH COMPANIES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 May 1992.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RUTLEDGE v. STROH COMPANIES\nNo. 131P92\nCase below: 105 N.C.App. 307"
  },
  "file_name": "0384-04",
  "first_page_order": 426,
  "last_page_order": 426
}