{
  "id": 2504213,
  "name": "STATE v. HORTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Horton",
  "decision_date": "1992-09-30",
  "docket_number": "No. 229P92",
  "first_page": "485",
  "last_page": "485",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "332 N.C. 485"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "106 N.C.App. 393",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 276,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.752,
    "sha256": "889ac9f420ee5c388534751513ac67786dfc2ae6d3fe9d73a620f58b6c8c22af",
    "simhash": "1:4ebc947bd928f009",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:54:56.199642+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HORTON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 30 September 1992. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 September 1992.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HORTON\nNo. 229P92\nCase below: 106 N.C.App. 393"
  },
  "file_name": "0485-03",
  "first_page_order": 513,
  "last_page_order": 513
}