{
  "id": 2505978,
  "name": "YARBOROUGH & CO. v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Yarborough & Co. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours",
  "decision_date": "1992-11-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 254P92",
  "first_page": "672",
  "last_page": "672",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "332 N.C. 672"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "106 N.C.App. 396",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 30,
    "char_count": 180,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.79,
    "sha256": "733905bb94f31344d61e1212fccd0eee140f87efd0cb82d5ca881a44ee277315",
    "simhash": "1:819a257bc0a9e043",
    "word_count": 30
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:54:56.199642+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "YARBOROUGH & CO. v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 November 1992.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "YARBOROUGH & CO. v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS\nNo. 254P92\nCase below: 106 N.C.App. 396"
  },
  "file_name": "0672-04",
  "first_page_order": 700,
  "last_page_order": 700
}