{
  "id": 2546066,
  "name": "IN RE BELK",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Belk",
  "decision_date": "1992-12-17",
  "docket_number": "No. 376P92",
  "first_page": "168",
  "last_page": "168",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 N.C. 168"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "107 N.C.App. 448",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527684
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/107/0448-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 277,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.699,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.082012696493116
    },
    "sha256": "5472cb996d1b61d3ee8235472efdd82182d3843c967e5b4c95bbfec51eab0ca4",
    "simhash": "1:8dbc3c63d738f81a",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:19:51.258099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE BELK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 17 December 1992. Petition by intervenor-petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 December 1992.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE BELK\nNo. 376P92\nCase below: 107 N.C.App. 448"
  },
  "file_name": "0168-01",
  "first_page_order": 216,
  "last_page_order": 216
}