{
  "id": 2547174,
  "name": "CONRAD RAY LUSK v. CRAWFORD PAINT COMPANY; RUSCON CORPORATION; GEORGE W. KANE, INCORPORATED; CAROLINA STEEL CORPORATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lusk v. Crawford Paint Co.",
  "decision_date": "1993-04-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 227PA92",
  "first_page": "535",
  "last_page": "535",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 N.C. 535"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "416 S.E.2d 207",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1992,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "106 N.C. App. 292",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5314200
      ],
      "year": 1992,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/106/0292-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1028,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.705,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.565170110192638e-08,
      "percentile": 0.28602574899154354
    },
    "sha256": "7042d44df86c5a97e3d1d762c84da50dccb8e93b63456c8e376b338d8a6dd37c",
    "simhash": "1:04b9343a0aad844f",
    "word_count": 152
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:19:51.258099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CONRAD RAY LUSK v. CRAWFORD PAINT COMPANY; RUSCON CORPORATION; GEORGE W. KANE, INCORPORATED; CAROLINA STEEL CORPORATION"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Herman L. Stephens for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Smith Helms Mull\u00eds & Moore, by Richmond G. Bernhardt, Jr., for defendant appellant Ruscon Corporation.",
      "Robinson Maready Lawing & Comerford, by Robert J. Lawing and Jane C. Jackson, for defendant appellant George W. Kane, Incorporated.",
      "Hutchins, Tyndall, Doughton & Moore, by H. Lee Davis, Jr., for defendant appellant Carolina Steel Corporation.",
      "Teague, Rotenstreich and Stanaland, by Stephen G. Teague, for defendant appellant Crawford Paint Company."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CONRAD RAY LUSK v. CRAWFORD PAINT COMPANY; RUSCON CORPORATION; GEORGE W. KANE, INCORPORATED; CAROLINA STEEL CORPORATION\nNo. 227PA92\n(Filed 8 April 1993)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 106 N.C. App. 292, 416 S.E.2d 207 (1992), reversing an order entered by Beaty, J., on 23 January 1991 in Superior Court, Forsyth County, and remanding to that court for further proceedings. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 March 1993.\nHerman L. Stephens for plaintiff appellee.\nSmith Helms Mull\u00eds & Moore, by Richmond G. Bernhardt, Jr., for defendant appellant Ruscon Corporation.\nRobinson Maready Lawing & Comerford, by Robert J. Lawing and Jane C. Jackson, for defendant appellant George W. Kane, Incorporated.\nHutchins, Tyndall, Doughton & Moore, by H. Lee Davis, Jr., for defendant appellant Carolina Steel Corporation.\nTeague, Rotenstreich and Stanaland, by Stephen G. Teague, for defendant appellant Crawford Paint Company."
  },
  "file_name": "0535-01",
  "first_page_order": 583,
  "last_page_order": 583
}