{
  "id": 2545339,
  "name": "DONALD R. CANADY, SR., and CONNIE H. CANADY v. OSCAR MANN, GAINES R. JOHNSON, WILLIAM J. BRINN, JR., and CAROLINA LAKES CORPORATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Canady v. Mann",
  "decision_date": "1993-05-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 349PA92",
  "first_page": "569",
  "last_page": "569",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 N.C. 569"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "419 S.E.2d 597",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1992,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "107 N.C. App. 252",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527466
      ],
      "year": 1992,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/107/0252-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1059,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.738,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.39425559651268e-08,
      "percentile": 0.48235437664512487
    },
    "sha256": "509cce3897b964c83a8d3ecf512465f863da15af30f28cee0c62e22adad1bea5",
    "simhash": "1:2431a64473a3ca24",
    "word_count": 161
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:19:51.258099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Parker did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "DONALD R. CANADY, SR., and CONNIE H. CANADY v. OSCAR MANN, GAINES R. JOHNSON, WILLIAM J. BRINN, JR., and CAROLINA LAKES CORPORATION"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAfter consideration of the new briefs and oral arguments, the Court determines that defendants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation\u2019s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.\nDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.\nJustice Parker did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rose, Ray, Winfrey & O\u2019Connor, P.A., by Ronald E. Winfrey and Pamela S. Leslie, for plaintiff-appellees.",
      "Brown & Robbins, by D.T. Scarborough III, for defendant-appellants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DONALD R. CANADY, SR., and CONNIE H. CANADY v. OSCAR MANN, GAINES R. JOHNSON, WILLIAM J. BRINN, JR., and CAROLINA LAKES CORPORATION\nNo. 349PA92\n(Filed 7 May 1993)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 107 N.C. App. 252, 419 S.E.2d 597 (1992), insofar as it reversed in part summary judgment for defendants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation entered by Clark, J., in Superior Court, Cumberland County, on 1 April 1992. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 April 1993.\nRose, Ray, Winfrey & O\u2019Connor, P.A., by Ronald E. Winfrey and Pamela S. Leslie, for plaintiff-appellees.\nBrown & Robbins, by D.T. Scarborough III, for defendant-appellants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation."
  },
  "file_name": "0569-01",
  "first_page_order": 617,
  "last_page_order": 617
}