{
  "id": 2550298,
  "name": "WILLIS G. NESBIT and ELIZABETH C. NESBIT v. PAUL HOWARD and EVELYN HOWARD",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nesbit v. Howard",
  "decision_date": "1993-06-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 79PA92",
  "first_page": "782",
  "last_page": "782",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 N.C. 782"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "412 S.E.2d 373",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1992,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "105 N.C. App. 105",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "year": 1992,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "403 S.E.2d 279",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1991,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "328 N.C. 722",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2543438
      ],
      "year": 1991,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/328/0722-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1056,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.487811476485076e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9809044851649652
    },
    "sha256": "b5b4252be88e128f7b970386475dc262ff6547ede44172b13921df658c41a231",
    "simhash": "1:0d35e6a50707e4dd",
    "word_count": 172
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:19:51.258099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIS G. NESBIT and ELIZABETH C. NESBIT v. PAUL HOWARD and EVELYN HOWARD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJustice Parker recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Kempson v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 328 N.C. 722, 403 S.E.2d 279 (1991).\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, by Reid C. Adams, Jr., and Thomas L. Nesbit, for plaintiff-appellants.",
      "David P. Parker for defendant-appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIS G. NESBIT and ELIZABETH C. NESBIT v. PAUL HOWARD and EVELYN HOWARD\nNo. 79PA92\n(Filed 4 June 1993)\nOn discretionary review of an unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 105 N.C. App. 105, 412 S.E.2d 373 (1992), reversing the judgment entered by John, J., in the Superior Court, Iredell County, on 14 September 1990 and remanding the case for trial on defendants\u2019 counterclaim for damages. Heard in the Supreme Court 6 October 1992.\nWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, by Reid C. Adams, Jr., and Thomas L. Nesbit, for plaintiff-appellants.\nDavid P. Parker for defendant-appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0782-01",
  "first_page_order": 830,
  "last_page_order": 830
}