{
  "id": 2547934,
  "name": "CAPITAL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. CITY OF RALEIGH",
  "name_abbreviation": "Capital Outdoor Advertising v. City of Raleigh",
  "decision_date": "1993-06-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 136PA93",
  "first_page": "789",
  "last_page": "789",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "333 N.C. 789"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "109 N.C.App. 399",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8525596
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/109/0399-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 286,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.762,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08204474469360955
    },
    "sha256": "324bc0916e0e3a9fa38bae8bb1c20ed0011f188383b54c52f8b1833ee9d6d206",
    "simhash": "1:89bbaa5bf6225c09",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:19:51.258099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CAPITAL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. CITY OF RALEIGH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by plaintiffs to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 3 June 1993. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 June 1993.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CAPITAL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. CITY OF RALEIGH\nNo. 136PA93\nCase below: 109 N.C.App. 399"
  },
  "file_name": "0789-05",
  "first_page_order": 837,
  "last_page_order": 837
}