{
  "id": 2529504,
  "name": "STATE v. TALLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Talley",
  "decision_date": "1993-07-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 214P93",
  "first_page": "438",
  "last_page": "438",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "334 N.C. 438"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "110 N.C.App. 180",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8525142
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/110/0180-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 260,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.796,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08181789749132093
    },
    "sha256": "0d9dfcee38b0bb04105514bdaae999f9e85aa21916a18821adc15f276dc9051a",
    "simhash": "1:abba816b7b329039",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:40:35.485142+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. TALLEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 July 1993. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 July 1993.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. TALLEY\nNo. 214P93\nCase below: 110 N.C.App. 180"
  },
  "file_name": "0438-03",
  "first_page_order": 462,
  "last_page_order": 462
}