{
  "id": 2530449,
  "name": "LANDON W. SLOAN, JR. and wife, PHYLLIS FAY SLOAN v. MILLER BUILDING CORPORATION, and CARLOS PEREZ, Individually and d/b/a PEREZ PAINTING COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sloan v. Miller Building Corp.",
  "decision_date": "1993-11-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 166PA93",
  "first_page": "169",
  "last_page": "169",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "335 N.C. 169"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "428 S.E.2d 292",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "109 N.C. App. 489",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1015,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.72,
    "sha256": "b2a5a0bd26eee7f2117a1454ac76f88e6bd12014e7b01ad0d16bc261e9e6d4cd",
    "simhash": "1:080120965770061d",
    "word_count": 149
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:54:49.870550+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LANDON W. SLOAN, JR. and wife, PHYLLIS FAY SLOAN v. MILLER BUILDING CORPORATION, and CARLOS PEREZ, Individually and d/b/a PEREZ PAINTING COMPANY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAfter reviewing the record proper and the briefs of the parties and considering the oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that plaintiff-appellants\u2019 petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.\nDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Armstrong & Armstrong, P.A., by Emery D. Ashley, for plaintiff-appellant's.",
      "Crossley McIntosh Prior & Collier, by Sharon J. Stovall, for defendant-appellee Perez, Individually and d/b/a Perez Painting Company."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LANDON W. SLOAN, JR. and wife, PHYLLIS FAY SLOAN v. MILLER BUILDING CORPORATION, and CARLOS PEREZ, Individually and d/b/a PEREZ PAINTING COMPANY\nNo. 166PA93\n(Filed 5 November 1993)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 109 N.C. App. 489, 428 S.E.2d 292 (1993), affirming entry of summary judgment by Wright, J., in favor of defendant Perez at the 9 September 1991 Civil Session of Superior Court, New Hanover County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 October 1993.\nArmstrong & Armstrong, P.A., by Emery D. Ashley, for plaintiff-appellant's.\nCrossley McIntosh Prior & Collier, by Sharon J. Stovall, for defendant-appellee Perez, Individually and d/b/a Perez Painting Company."
  },
  "file_name": "0169-01",
  "first_page_order": 203,
  "last_page_order": 203
}