{
  "id": 2530234,
  "name": "IN RE JOYNER",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Joyner",
  "decision_date": "1993-10-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 337A93",
  "first_page": "174",
  "last_page": "174",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "335 N.C. 174"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "111 N.C.App. 454",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8522657
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/111/0454-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 28,
    "char_count": 183,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.75,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08182716444086123
    },
    "sha256": "30227b60b52f9c2e485ecb734aacb0eac32b3a968e870126266f1c59b29eeb15",
    "simhash": "1:23f380397fb4a403",
    "word_count": 28
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:54:49.870550+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE JOYNER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by Attorney General to dismiss respondent\u2019s appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 October 1993.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE JOYNER\nNo. 337A93\nCase below: 111 N.C.App. 454"
  },
  "file_name": "0174-01",
  "first_page_order": 208,
  "last_page_order": 208
}