{
  "id": 2532016,
  "name": "CAMERON W. CANTWELL v. JANET A. CANTWELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cantwell v. Cantwell",
  "decision_date": "1993-12-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 186PA93",
  "first_page": "235",
  "last_page": "235",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "335 N.C. 235"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "427 S.E.2d 129",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "109 N.C. App. 395",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8525575
      ],
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/109/0395-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 872,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.765,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.243821620283089e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4320999023495192
    },
    "sha256": "a7f069ec8942ca7240d016072c2c2f1a09afa60b042e3e79b1a4c0abdf502be8",
    "simhash": "1:125931346e3f1444",
    "word_count": 131
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:54:49.870550+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CAMERON W. CANTWELL v. JANET A. CANTWELL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAfter reviewing the record proper and the briefs of the parties and considering the oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that defendant-appellant\u2019s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.\nDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dennis J. Winner, P.A., by Dennis J. Winner, for plaintiff-appelle e.",
      "Gum, Hillier and Friesen, P.A., by Howard L. Gum; and Carter & Kropelnicki, P.A., by Steven Kropelnicki, Jr., for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CAMERON W. CANTWELL v. JANET A. CANTWELL\nNo. 186PA93\n(Filed 3 December 1993)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 109 N.C. App. 395, 427 S.E.2d 129 (1993), affirming an order by Cash, J., dismissing defendant\u2019s claim for alimony, entered 2 December 1991 in District Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 November 1993.\nDennis J. Winner, P.A., by Dennis J. Winner, for plaintiff-appelle e.\nGum, Hillier and Friesen, P.A., by Howard L. Gum; and Carter & Kropelnicki, P.A., by Steven Kropelnicki, Jr., for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0235-01",
  "first_page_order": 269,
  "last_page_order": 269
}