{
  "id": 2528882,
  "name": "STATE v. TUCKER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Tucker",
  "decision_date": "1993-12-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 452P93",
  "first_page": "564",
  "last_page": "564",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "335 N.C. 564"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "111 N.C.App. 907",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524729
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/111/0907-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 276,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08181191258640948
    },
    "sha256": "fe34b42dcd9b687dadebd2183954b2d081fd91d09fa49fbca256f99c9671179a",
    "simhash": "1:2bfe14ebdaeae52b",
    "word_count": 43
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:54:49.870550+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. TUCKER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack,of substantial constitutional question allowed 2 December 1993. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1993.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. TUCKER\nNo. 452P93\nCase below: 111 N.C.App. 907"
  },
  "file_name": "0564-03",
  "first_page_order": 598,
  "last_page_order": 598
}