{
  "id": 2536544,
  "name": "ADA T. SMITH; ADA KELLY SMITH HINES and husband, LOVIT HINES, et al v. SAM B. UNDERWOOD, JR.; SANDRA LEE HONEYCUTT (Divorced); et al",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Underwood",
  "decision_date": "1994-05-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 4A94",
  "first_page": "306",
  "last_page": "306",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "336 N.C. 306"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "437 S.E.2d 512",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 N.C. App. 45",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8520582
      ],
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/113/0045-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1354,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.746,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.154493008883296e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7690475390650189
    },
    "sha256": "c8f103be14bacd03ecf9ab2d4adff1bf3153106bdebfe3b2b637dd6c37f49717",
    "simhash": "1:181bfe9b66a2e4b3",
    "word_count": 236
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:12:07.467663+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ADA T. SMITH; ADA KELLY SMITH HINES and husband, LOVIT HINES, et al v. SAM B. UNDERWOOD, JR.; SANDRA LEE HONEYCUTT (Divorced); et al"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by John, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Pitt County, for reinstatement of the trial court\u2019s order denying, in its discretion, the petition to remove the respondent-appellant as a co-trustee of the Ada T. Smith and W. H. Smith Trust.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bass, Bryant & Moore, by John Walter Bryant and William E. Moore, Jr., for petitioner-appellees.",
      "Ward and Smith, P.A., by Ry\u00e1l W. Tayloe and A. Charles Ellis, for respondent-appellant Sam B. Underwood, Jr."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ADA T. SMITH; ADA KELLY SMITH HINES and husband, LOVIT HINES, et al v. SAM B. UNDERWOOD, JR.; SANDRA LEE HONEYCUTT (Divorced); et al\nNo. 4A94\n(Filed 6 May 1994)\nAppeal by respondent Sam B. Underwood, Jr., pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2), from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 113 N.C. App. 45, 437 S.E.2d 512 (1993), which reversed an order entered on 27 January 1992, nunc pro tunc 17 January 1992, by Herring, J., in the Superior Court, Pitt County, in which the trial court in its discretion denied petitioners\u2019 petition to remove the respondent, Sam B. Underwood, Jr., as co-trustee of the Ada T. Smith and W. H. Smith Trust. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 April 1994.\nBass, Bryant & Moore, by John Walter Bryant and William E. Moore, Jr., for petitioner-appellees.\nWard and Smith, P.A., by Ry\u00e1l W. Tayloe and A. Charles Ellis, for respondent-appellant Sam B. Underwood, Jr."
  },
  "file_name": "0306-01",
  "first_page_order": 346,
  "last_page_order": 346
}