{
  "id": 2551157,
  "name": "NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM",
  "name_abbreviation": "Naegele Outdoor Advertising v. City of Winston-Salem",
  "decision_date": "1994-09-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 158A94",
  "first_page": "695",
  "last_page": "695",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "337 N.C. 695"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "113 N.C.App. 759",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 46,
    "char_count": 416,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.719,
    "sha256": "9a25efea7184065905ced4a0e558d3677c84879c0222348646a517e9aa0349f7",
    "simhash": "1:89be256afbebf62a",
    "word_count": 67
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:06:06.194618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 September 1994. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 8 September 1994.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM\nNo. 158A94\nCase below: 113 N.C.App. 759"
  },
  "file_name": "0695-03",
  "first_page_order": 723,
  "last_page_order": 723
}