{
  "id": 2550949,
  "name": "STATE v. CONNELLY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Connelly",
  "decision_date": "1994-09-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 210P94",
  "first_page": "697",
  "last_page": "697",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "337 N.C. 697"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "114 N.C.App. 269",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 280,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.802,
    "sha256": "c364b59551e887622b936efa9a489b0f5b48a6b2c9b3d381747d45504b682200",
    "simhash": "1:2fbd947bd42af870",
    "word_count": 43
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:06:06.194618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CONNELLY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 September 1994. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 September 1994.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CONNELLY\nNo. 210P94\nCase below: 114 N.C.App. 269"
  },
  "file_name": "0697-01",
  "first_page_order": 725,
  "last_page_order": 725
}