{
  "id": 2552220,
  "name": "CHESAPEAKE MICROFILM, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chesapeake Microfilm, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment",
  "decision_date": "1994-10-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 435A93",
  "first_page": "797",
  "last_page": "798",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "337 N.C. 797"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "434 S.E.2d 218",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "111 N.C. App. 737",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8523769
      ],
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/111/0737-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 940,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.74,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3465279249871325
    },
    "sha256": "cb2603083c47f66f4613b2d83272e63ea0fc46ad2174d16874f17dde1f038b6a",
    "simhash": "1:5c16443243b3952d",
    "word_count": 145
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:06:06.194618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CHESAPEAKE MICROFILM, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moore and Brown, by B. Ervin Brown, II, and David B. Puryear, Jr., for petitioner-appellant.",
      "Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Francis W. Crawley and Daniel F. McLawhom, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CHESAPEAKE MICROFILM, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES\nNo. 435A93\n(Filed 6 October 1994)\nAppeal by Chesapeake Microfilm, Inc., pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 111 N.C. App. 737, 434 S.E.2d 218 (1993), reversing the judgment entered by Hairston, J., at the 7 October 1991 Civil Session of Superior Court, Forsyth County, which vacated the final agency decision of the Environmental Management Commission, and remanding for reinstatement of the penalty assessed by the Commission. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 1994.\nMoore and Brown, by B. Ervin Brown, II, and David B. Puryear, Jr., for petitioner-appellant.\nMichael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Francis W. Crawley and Daniel F. McLawhom, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0797-01",
  "first_page_order": 825,
  "last_page_order": 826
}