{
  "id": 2558968,
  "name": "IN RE LAMM",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Lamm",
  "decision_date": "1995-02-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 539A94",
  "first_page": "613",
  "last_page": "613",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "339 N.C. 613"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "116 N.C.App. 382",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8524139
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/116/0382-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 51,
    "char_count": 372,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.764,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08217448198717377
    },
    "sha256": "916710e805db0e7128e91c0a562d9fe4e9b25a23aad9ce93423aabaedad47a85",
    "simhash": "1:f92e26ebf2e5ae64",
    "word_count": 65
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:14:35.214532+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE LAMM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by respondent (Anne M. Lamm) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 9 February 1995. Motion by North Carolina State Bar to dismiss appeal denied 9 February 1995.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE LAMM\nNo. 539A94\nCase below: 116 N.C.App. 382"
  },
  "file_name": "0613-01",
  "first_page_order": 651,
  "last_page_order": 651
}