{
  "id": 8692587,
  "name": "J. F. HOKE'S Ex'rs vs. JAMES CARTER'S Adm'rs",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hoke's Ex'rs v. Carter's Adm'rs",
  "decision_date": "1851-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "327",
  "last_page": "327",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "12 Ired. 327"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "34 N.C. 327"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1436,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.449,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.12982294956584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32372061073830943
    },
    "sha256": "58bae3c205d1c16b7f41d5b72295836917a897f57e6f3655716109aa93008951",
    "simhash": "1:4df9fe34dea55344",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:40:22.332414+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. F. HOKE\u2019S Ex\u2019rs vs. JAMES CARTER\u2019S Adm'rs."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pearson, J.\nWe cannot entertain the appeal. The defendants do not except to the judgment. It is just what they asked for \u2014 they are not \u201c dissatisfied therewith.\u201d How can they appeal ?\nIt is only when both parties except to the judgment, as erroneous, that both have a ground tor appeal, as in the case of Devereux v Burgwin. The defendant excepted, because of error in not giving judgment in his favor; and the defendant excepted, because of error, in that he was not allowed interest upon the $1,000, for which he had judgment.\nThe appeal must be dismissed, arid the defendants will-pay the costs of appeal.\nPer. Curiam. Judgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pearson, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Avery and Bynum for the plaintiffs.",
      "iV. W. W'oodfm and Gaither for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. F. HOKE\u2019S Ex\u2019rs vs. JAMES CARTER\u2019S Adm'rs.\nA party cannot appeal, when the judgment ia in hia fayor, juat as he wanted it.\nIt is only when both parties except to the judgment as erroneous, that both have a ground for appeal.\nAopeal from the Superior Court of Law of Burke county, Spring Term, 1851, his Honor Judge Settle presiding.\nThis is the same case, which has been decided at this term, upon the appeal of the plaintiffs, and is brought up here upon the appeal of the defendants, with a view of presenting an exception, because of the rejection of Fleming, who was offered by the defendants, for the purpose of proving, that the sale and delivery of the bond had certain conditions annexed thereto.\nAvery and Bynum for the plaintiffs.\niV. W. W'oodfm and Gaither for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0327-01",
  "first_page_order": 335,
  "last_page_order": 335
}