{
  "id": 790116,
  "name": "ANNIE LEAK and RUFUS LEAK v. AUBRY DEAN HOLLAR",
  "name_abbreviation": "Leak v. Hollar",
  "decision_date": "1995-04-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 214PA94",
  "first_page": "99",
  "last_page": "99",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "340 N.C. 99"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "441 S.E.2d 190",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 N.C. App. 836",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "453 S.E.2d 522",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1995,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "designation of incorrect county on civil summons is not jurisdictional defect which renders summons void but is irregularity in form correctable by amending summons in accordance with Rule 4(i)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "339 N.C. 578",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2556660
      ],
      "year": 1995,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "designation of incorrect county on civil summons is not jurisdictional defect which renders summons void but is irregularity in form correctable by amending summons in accordance with Rule 4(i)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/339/0578-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "453 S.E.2d 522",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "339 N.C. 578",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2556660
      ],
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/339/0578-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1339,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.7,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.02846092571420187
    },
    "sha256": "55f23dd14f0445136388d81d9cc79b44940d32f5d28898fc030549bb6a81d920",
    "simhash": "1:6e3872ee4657411c",
    "word_count": 217
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:34:40.112900+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ANNIE LEAK and RUFUS LEAK v. AUBRY DEAN HOLLAR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nUnder the authority of Hazelwood v. Bailey, 339 N.C. 578, 453 S.E.2d 522 (1995), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for remand to the trial court for reinstatement of the action.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Granfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Susan K. Burkhart, and Bonfoey, Brown, Queen & Patten, P.A., by Frank G. Queen, for plaintiff-appellants.",
      "Blue, Fellerath, Gloninger & Barbour, P.A., by Sheila Fellerath, for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ANNIE LEAK and RUFUS LEAK v. AUBRY DEAN HOLLAR\nNo. 214PA94\n(Filed 7 April 1995)\nProcess and Service \u00a7 17 (NCI4tli)\u2014 incorrect county on summons \u2014 correctable error\nA decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed under the authority of Hazelwood v. Bailey, 339 N.C. 578, 453 S.E.2d 522 (1995) (designation of incorrect county on civil summons is not jurisdictional defect which renders summons void but is irregularity in form correctable by amending summons in accordance with Rule 4(i)).\nAm Jur 2d, Process \u00a7\u00a7 94 et seq.\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of an unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 113 N.C. App. 836, 441 S.E.2d 190 (1994), which affirmed the trial court\u2019s dismissal of plaintiffs\u2019 action based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 March 1995.\nGranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Susan K. Burkhart, and Bonfoey, Brown, Queen & Patten, P.A., by Frank G. Queen, for plaintiff-appellants.\nBlue, Fellerath, Gloninger & Barbour, P.A., by Sheila Fellerath, for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0099-01",
  "first_page_order": 131,
  "last_page_order": 131
}