{
  "id": 790160,
  "name": "COUNTY OF LENOIR CITY OF KINSTON v. WILLIAM H. MOORE, JR., ET AL",
  "name_abbreviation": "County of Lenoir City v. Moore",
  "decision_date": "1995-04-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 216A94",
  "first_page": "104",
  "last_page": "104",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "340 N.C. 104"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "441 S.E.2d 589",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "114 N.C. App. 110",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527215
      ],
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/114/0110-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "429 S.E.2d 730",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "333 N.C. 782",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2550298
      ],
      "year": 1993,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/333/0782-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1163,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.749,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.122860068522279e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5739197536227015
    },
    "sha256": "314dac0e5f302d310dd9452f99bc55e61036d50d4fcb104077749e17f42e010a",
    "simhash": "1:0d3e74b523a5c445",
    "word_count": 189
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:34:40.112900+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "COUNTY OF LENOIR CITY OF KINSTON v. WILLIAM H. MOORE, JR., ET AL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nJustice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Griffin & Griffin, by Robert W. Griffin, for the plaintiffappellees.",
      "Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Christopher E. Allen, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant-appellant North Carolina Department of Revenue."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "COUNTY OF LENOIR CITY OF KINSTON v. WILLIAM H. MOORE, JR., ET AL\nNo. 216A94\n(Filed 7 April 1995)\nAppeal by defendant North Carolina Department of Revenue pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) of the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 114 N.C. App. 110, 441 S.E.2d 589 (1994), affirming the judgment allowing plaintiffs\u2019 motion for summary judgment entered by Exum, J., at the 8 September 1992 Civil Session of District Court, Lenoir County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 13 March 1995.\nGriffin & Griffin, by Robert W. Griffin, for the plaintiffappellees.\nMichael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Christopher E. Allen, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant-appellant North Carolina Department of Revenue."
  },
  "file_name": "0104-01",
  "first_page_order": 136,
  "last_page_order": 136
}