{
  "id": 790221,
  "name": "STATE EX REL. TUCKER v. FRINZI",
  "name_abbreviation": "State ex rel. Tucker v. Frinzi",
  "decision_date": "1995-07-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 306A95",
  "first_page": "572",
  "last_page": "572",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "340 N.C. 572"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 387,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.733,
    "sha256": "2f0cf61474f8dcb394997b7c59ec125ef6a57503f8d9a043f539348c64e6d9f5",
    "simhash": "1:d9eaa2b3b1d68406",
    "word_count": 67
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:34:40.112900+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE EX REL. TUCKER v. FRINZI"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas allowed 27 July 1995. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 27 July 1995.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE EX REL. TUCKER v. FRINZI\nNo. 306A95\nCase below: 119 N.C.App.(5 July 1995)"
  },
  "file_name": "0572-04",
  "first_page_order": 604,
  "last_page_order": 604
}
