{
  "id": 793210,
  "name": "STATE v. BROOKS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Brooks",
  "decision_date": "1995-10-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 381P95",
  "first_page": "654",
  "last_page": "654",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "341 N.C. 654"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 N.C.App. 798",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 279,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.747,
    "sha256": "b9babf61e2918c815a16930b1bcfaf3bfca99b9858d14a13416df900ed2a168b",
    "simhash": "1:09ec88735ebe6831",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:14:42.837437+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BROOKS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant (Pro Se) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1995. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1995.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BROOKS\nNo. 381P95\nCase below: 119 N.C.App. 798"
  },
  "file_name": "0654-01",
  "first_page_order": 688,
  "last_page_order": 688
}