{
  "id": 796027,
  "name": "STATE v. ODUM",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Odum",
  "decision_date": "1995-11-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 368A95",
  "first_page": "195",
  "last_page": "195",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 N.C. 195"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 N.C. App. 676",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11917063
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/119/0676-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 51,
    "char_count": 518,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.781,
    "sha256": "a58c516ffbc7dbb4c43c5f64dd3f19f6c27a1cb8ea3711c7161eb122a9836668",
    "simhash": "1:01d814cbf3d0f47c",
    "word_count": 88
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:36:26.105751+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ODUM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 2 November 1995. Petition by defendant for discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 November 1995. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 allowed 2 November 1995.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ODUM\nNo. 368A95\nCase below: 119 N.C. App. 676"
  },
  "file_name": "0195-05",
  "first_page_order": 227,
  "last_page_order": 227
}