{
  "id": 795922,
  "name": "ROSE v. ISENHOUR BRICK & TILE CO.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rose v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.",
  "decision_date": "1995-12-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 448A95",
  "first_page": "415",
  "last_page": "415",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 N.C. 415"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "120 N.C.App. 235",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11915008
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/120/0235-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 45,
    "char_count": 301,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.81,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.02860263281758898
    },
    "sha256": "358b9744b89ee1d7da63b4c51073d9ccb38fd128d4460387822031fc61597229",
    "simhash": "1:09ae2cfaf9d52442",
    "word_count": 52
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:36:26.105751+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROSE v. ISENHOUR BRICK & TILE CO."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 7 December 1995.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROSE v. ISENHOUR BRICK & TILE CO.\nNo. 448A95\nCase below: 120 N.C.App. 235"
  },
  "file_name": "0415-04",
  "first_page_order": 447,
  "last_page_order": 447
}