{
  "id": 796064,
  "name": "BROMHAL v. STOTT",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bromhal v. Stott",
  "decision_date": "1995-12-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 520A94",
  "first_page": "418",
  "last_page": "418",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 N.C. 418"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "341 N.C. 702",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        793212
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/341/0702-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 22,
    "char_count": 129,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.682,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0725433798000715e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5601110335004087
    },
    "sha256": "c2dea1d437bd4282e2459f504e995d6d51276881bf007c02e89c072b4c2563c0",
    "simhash": "1:942d495aa0c9c1ee",
    "word_count": 23
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:36:26.105751+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BROMHAL v. STOTT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant to rehear pursuant to Rule 31 denied 7 December 1995.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BROMHAL v. STOTT\nNo. 520A94\nCase below: 341 N.C. 702"
  },
  "file_name": "0418-01",
  "first_page_order": 450,
  "last_page_order": 450
}