{
  "id": 795966,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CURTIS BALDWIN SHOFF",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Shoff",
  "decision_date": "1996-02-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 244PA95",
  "first_page": "638",
  "last_page": "639",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 N.C. 638"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "456 S.E.2d 875",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "118 N.C. App. 724",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11920889
      ],
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/118/0724-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "348 S.E.2d 593",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "318 N.C. 408",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        4733226
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/318/0408-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1237,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.707,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.8870498835867783e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7284776062233744
    },
    "sha256": "ac1ca7235e8413a346e3719716c76fbf2c79a868700ef4413fa2d02395830ba3",
    "simhash": "1:0c8c36ba42a1431d",
    "word_count": 195
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:36:26.105751+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CURTIS BALDWIN SHOFF"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe Court of Appeals correctly held that the order at issue was interlocutory and nonappealable. State v. Henry, 318 N.C. 408, 348 S.E.2d 593 (1986). The decision of the Court of Appeals is therefore\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Wade Hall for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CURTIS BALDWIN SHOFF\nNo. 244PA95\n(Filed 9 February 1996)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 115 (NCI4th)\u2014 order denying double jeopardy claim \u2014 no immediate appeal\nThe Court of Appeals correctly held that an order denying defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss a driving while impaired charge on double jeopardy grounds was interlocutory and nonappealable.\nAm Jur 2d, Appellate Review \u00a7 239.\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 118 N.C. App. 724, 456 S.E.2d 875 (1995), dismissing as interlocutory and nonappealable defendant\u2019s attempted appeal from an order entered by Allen (C. Walter), J., on 23 February 1994 in Superior Court, Buncombe County, denying defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss (on double jeopardy grounds) a charge that defendant was driving while impaired. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 December 1995.\nMichael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.\nWade Hall for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0638-01",
  "first_page_order": 670,
  "last_page_order": 671
}