{
  "id": 796013,
  "name": "RUTH A. EURY v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eury v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1996-02-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 535PA94",
  "first_page": "645",
  "last_page": "645",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 N.C. 645"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "448 S.E.2d 389",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "116 N.C. App. 490",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "year": 1994,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "467 S.E.2d 34",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "342 N.C. 482",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        795937
      ],
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/342/0482-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 864,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.719,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.02860842466105167
    },
    "sha256": "052e6a67630022839ab763ade3a94c38fff3d26c1c113e48557b80132f496d52",
    "simhash": "1:214162a76221263a",
    "word_count": 140
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:36:26.105751+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RUTH A. EURY v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of the authority of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mabe, 342 N.C. 482, 467 S.E.2d 34 (1996).\nVACATED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Smith, Foll\u00edn & James, L.L.P., by J. David James, for plaintiffappellee.",
      "Baucom, Claytor, Benton, Morgan, Wood & White, P.A., by Rex C. Morgan, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RUTH A. EURY v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY\nNo. 535PA94\n(Filed 9 February 1996)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 116 N.C. App. 490, 448 S.E.2d 389 (1994), affirming an order entered by Helms, J., on 19 August 1993, in Superior Court, Union County. Pursuant-to Rule 30(f)(1) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, this case was reviewed without oral argument.\nSmith, Foll\u00edn & James, L.L.P., by J. David James, for plaintiffappellee.\nBaucom, Claytor, Benton, Morgan, Wood & White, P.A., by Rex C. Morgan, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0645-01",
  "first_page_order": 677,
  "last_page_order": 677
}