{
  "id": 796074,
  "name": "STATE v. CRENSHAW",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Crenshaw",
  "decision_date": "1996-02-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 16P96",
  "first_page": "660",
  "last_page": "660",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "342 N.C. 660"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "121 N.C.App. 217",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 300,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.698,
    "sha256": "1c110c3432f8b2f57a9e7b524c1fcb829bfdcfed5461ca89649b9fa20d5064eb",
    "simhash": "1:ed0dc46b1be9d219",
    "word_count": 50
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:36:26.105751+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CRENSHAW"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant (Pro Se) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 February 1996. Petition by defendant (Pro Se) for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 February 1996.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CRENSHAW\nNo. 16P96\nCase below: 121 N.C.App. 217"
  },
  "file_name": "0660-01",
  "first_page_order": 692,
  "last_page_order": 692
}