{
  "id": 798873,
  "name": "STATE v. KALEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Kaley",
  "decision_date": "1996-04-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 38A95",
  "first_page": "126",
  "last_page": "126",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "343 N.C. 126"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "117 N.C.App. 420",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8525582
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/117/0420-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 29,
    "char_count": 191,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.75,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.028687965977939253
    },
    "sha256": "8dbecebf27aa5d8b1e7e2709607a574fb709770a4d929b904d9bd6771806e61b",
    "simhash": "1:d1775cdb66faa894",
    "word_count": 31
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:14:44.802104+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. KALEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Attorney General\u2019s motion in the alternative to consider question presented in appellant\u2019s brief pursuant to Rule 2 denied 3 April 1996.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. KALEY\nNo. 38A95\nCase below: 117 N.C.App. 420"
  },
  "file_name": "0126-03",
  "first_page_order": 174,
  "last_page_order": 174
}