{
  "id": 867540,
  "name": "MAHONEY v. RONNIE'S ROAD SERVICE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mahoney v. Ronnie's Road Service",
  "decision_date": "1996-09-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 171A96",
  "first_page": "438",
  "last_page": "438",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "344 N.C. 438"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "122 N.C. App. 151",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 51,
    "char_count": 400,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.762,
    "sha256": "902773e3caf07dc88ba643cbacbb326f6378af301ad344b152a8055a58d9996f",
    "simhash": "1:411e24ea3384e506",
    "word_count": 64
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:15:37.608853+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MAHONEY v. RONNIE\u2019S ROAD SERVICE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by plaintiffs (substantial constitutional question) dismissed 5 September 1996. Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 5 September 1996.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MAHONEY v. RONNIE\u2019S ROAD SERVICE\nNo. 171A96\nCase below: 122 N.C. App. 151"
  },
  "file_name": "0438-01",
  "first_page_order": 470,
  "last_page_order": 470
}