{
  "id": 867606,
  "name": "STATE v. ROGERS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Rogers",
  "decision_date": "1996-10-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 379P96",
  "first_page": "635",
  "last_page": "635",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "344 N.C. 635"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "123 N.C. App. 359",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 259,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.793,
    "sha256": "8ba1095750d1013ef607541967da861111b3a8fa68d5a86ead1ee992b1cac7b2",
    "simhash": "1:86f9147b9039f86c",
    "word_count": 40
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:15:37.608853+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ROGERS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 10 October 1996. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 October 1996.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ROGERS\nNo. 379P96\nCase below: 123 N.C. App. 359"
  },
  "file_name": "0635-05",
  "first_page_order": 667,
  "last_page_order": 667
}