{
  "id": 867576,
  "name": "STOUT v. CITY OF DURHAM",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stout v. City of Durham",
  "decision_date": "1996-10-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 156PA96",
  "first_page": "637",
  "last_page": "637",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "344 N.C. 637"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "121 N.C. App. 716",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11919991
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/121/0716-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 27,
    "char_count": 162,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.814,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.030570315103312973
    },
    "sha256": "6fa5b2f802f3229e6077083ce3a40ce9febf03786d1995c0e806454e2ecdf44f",
    "simhash": "1:8df220409a213c60",
    "word_count": 27
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:15:37.608853+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STOUT v. CITY OF DURHAM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 10 October 1996.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STOUT v. CITY OF DURHAM\nNo. 156PA96\nCase below: 121 N.C. App. 716"
  },
  "file_name": "0637-03",
  "first_page_order": 669,
  "last_page_order": 669
}