{
  "id": 54058,
  "name": "STATE v. TAYLOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Taylor",
  "decision_date": "1997-02-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 31A93-2",
  "first_page": "352",
  "last_page": "353",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "345 N.C. 352"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 620,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.766,
    "sha256": "56a5648971bc2f9fdaa0dd24e3836972de9667afe1f6e20911db56939408e622",
    "simhash": "1:0f281e32fb8d459c",
    "word_count": 94
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:52:16.077233+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. TAYLOR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Upon petition by defendant for writ of certiorari and writ of supersedeas, the following order is entered: Although this Court determined in State v. Conner, 335 N.C. at 644-45, that certain questions submitted by defense counsel to some prospective jurors in this case were proper questions under Morgan, we conclude that any error in sustaining objections to those questions was not prejudicial under the peculiar facts of this case. Defendant\u2019s other issues are procedurally barred. Accordingly, defendant\u2019s petition is denied 7 February 1997.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. TAYLOR\nNo. 31A93-2\nCase below: Cumberland County Superior Court"
  },
  "file_name": "0352-05",
  "first_page_order": 406,
  "last_page_order": 407
}