{
  "id": 54143,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AMY JANE SISK",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sisk",
  "decision_date": "1997-04-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 371A96",
  "first_page": "749",
  "last_page": "749",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "345 N.C. 749"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "473 S.E.2d 348",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "123 N.C. App. 361",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11913311
      ],
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/123/0361-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 933,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.748,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2522035915679857e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6104255499065776
    },
    "sha256": "422d97e8cb966f8502f945a165e5b6969b39b63589dccd240e2a5689e3859043",
    "simhash": "1:1e3914a2533b845f",
    "word_count": 152
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:52:16.077233+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AMY JANE SISK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Johnson. We hold that defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.\nAFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by J. Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Paul M. James, III, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AMY JANE SISK\nNo. 371A96\n(Filed 11 April 1997)\nAppeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 123 N.C. App. 361, 473 S.E.2d 348 (1996), affirming a judgment entered by DeRamus, J., on 24 March 1995 in Superior Court, Forsyth County. On 7 November 1996 this Court allowed defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 20 March 1997.\nMichael F. Easley, Attorney General, by J. Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nPaul M. James, III, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0749-01",
  "first_page_order": 803,
  "last_page_order": 803
}