{
  "id": 54173,
  "name": "STATE v. HAMILTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hamilton",
  "decision_date": "1997-04-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 95P97",
  "first_page": "757",
  "last_page": "757",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "345 N.C. 757"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "125 N.C.App. 396",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11868081
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/125/0396-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 268,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.77,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0017203705698672007
    },
    "sha256": "844ed75431cbe8bbbea20f95c25cf45233f30a8437b510eca152226f0e4a7616",
    "simhash": "1:c0a85573b0f2c006",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:52:16.077233+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HAMILTON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant (substantial constitutional question) dismissed by the Court ex mero motu 10 April 1997. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 April 1997.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HAMILTON\nNo. 95P97\nCase below: 125 N.C.App. 396"
  },
  "file_name": "0757-03",
  "first_page_order": 811,
  "last_page_order": 811
}