{
  "id": 139555,
  "name": "RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHC DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a TIMCO, INC., f/k/a DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a RICHLAND PROPERTIES INC. and CAPITAL HOLDING CORPORATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Richland Run Homeowners Ass'n v. CHC Durham Corp.",
  "decision_date": "1997-05-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 391A96",
  "first_page": "170",
  "last_page": "170",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "346 N.C. 170"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "473 S.E.2d 649",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "123 N.C. App. 345",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11913273
      ],
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/123/0345-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1070,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.735,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.93708406609518e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4620454706046569
    },
    "sha256": "2e7bf17fe7a9af38abf333a2ef86e85094c030ab33124dfc0444ae1ec5a70a39",
    "simhash": "1:a81f7484263383ec",
    "word_count": 170
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:00.247328+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHC DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a TIMCO, INC., f/k/a DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a RICHLAND PROPERTIES INC. and CAPITAL HOLDING CORPORATION"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with Judge Greene\u2019s dissenting opinion.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton L.L.P, by Samuel T. Wyrick, III, and, Lee M. Whitman, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Wyche & Story, L.L.P., by N. Hunter Wyche, Jr., and Philip R. Isley, for defendant-appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHC DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a TIMCO, INC., f/k/a DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a RICHLAND PROPERTIES INC. and CAPITAL HOLDING CORPORATION\nNo. 391A96\n(Filed 9 May 1997)\nAppeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 123 N.C. App. 345, 473 S.E.2d 649 (1996), affirming an order allowing defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss entered by Hight, J., on 9 September 1994, in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 April 1997.\nWyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton L.L.P, by Samuel T. Wyrick, III, and, Lee M. Whitman, for plaintiff-appellant.\nWyche & Story, L.L.P., by N. Hunter Wyche, Jr., and Philip R. Isley, for defendant-appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0170-01",
  "first_page_order": 208,
  "last_page_order": 208
}