{
  "id": 551159,
  "name": "RANDOLPH H. TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK & TRUST; RICHARD H. CRONK, JR.; PLAYER I, a North Carolina General Partnership and KITTY PLAYER BECK",
  "name_abbreviation": "Trull v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust",
  "decision_date": "1997-10-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 524A96",
  "first_page": "262",
  "last_page": "262",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 N.C. 262"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "478 S.E.2d 39",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "124 N.C. App. 486",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11889873
      ],
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/124/0486-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1071,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.72,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.566513206301175e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4022398603161806
    },
    "sha256": "d311adb32a9d53cebc2fcf7a933b503f3d45e862252abccb0fb1ec8739b7a0bc",
    "simhash": "1:0470b598322996c2",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:32:58.211595+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RANDOLPH H. TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK & TRUST; RICHARD H. CRONK, JR.; PLAYER I, a North Carolina General Partnership and KITTY PLAYER BECK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Eagles. We hold that plaintiffs petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.\nAFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bums, Day & Presnell, P.A., by Lacy M. Presnell III and Susan F. Vick, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "H. Spencer Barrow and George B. Currin for defendantappellee Central Carolina Bank & Trust."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RANDOLPH H. TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK & TRUST; RICHARD H. CRONK, JR.; PLAYER I, a North Carolina General Partnership and KITTY PLAYER BECK\nNo. 524A96\n(Filed 3 October 1997)\nAppeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 124 N.C. App. 486, 478 S.E.2d 39 (1996), affirming an order entered by Cashwell, J., on 31 July 1995 in Superior Court, Wake County. On 6 March 1997 this Court allowed plaintiffs petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 September 1997.\nBums, Day & Presnell, P.A., by Lacy M. Presnell III and Susan F. Vick, for plaintiff-appellant.\nH. Spencer Barrow and George B. Currin for defendantappellee Central Carolina Bank & Trust."
  },
  "file_name": "0262-01",
  "first_page_order": 302,
  "last_page_order": 302
}