{
  "id": 551138,
  "name": "BRADY v. N.C. BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brady v. N.C. Bd. of Dental Examiners",
  "decision_date": "1997-10-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 398A97",
  "first_page": "263",
  "last_page": "263",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 N.C. 263"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "126 N.C.App. 829",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 45,
    "char_count": 313,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.792,
    "sha256": "ed5da3f5a4a6d0cd69dc68c13b5d2cbff668fe5e687dedaef4a66ea5baf271ee",
    "simhash": "1:2f8ea6c9d3a4e076",
    "word_count": 54
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:32:58.211595+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BRADY v. N.C. BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by petitioner (Brady) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 2 October 1997.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BRADY v. N.C. BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERS\nNo. 398A97\nCase below: 126 N.C.App. 829"
  },
  "file_name": "0263-05",
  "first_page_order": 303,
  "last_page_order": 303
}