{
  "id": 551214,
  "name": "ANDREW THOMAS HARTSELL v. INTEGON INDEMNITY CORPORATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hartsell v. Integon Indemnity Corp.",
  "decision_date": "1997-12-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 342A97",
  "first_page": "385",
  "last_page": "386",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 N.C. 385"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "485 S.E.2d 893",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 N.C. App. 511",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11711574
      ],
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/126/0511-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "36 ALR4th 7",
      "category": "reporters:specialty",
      "reporter": "A.L.R. 4th",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "71 ALR2d 223",
      "category": "reporters:specialty",
      "reporter": "A.L.R. 2d",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 180,
    "char_count": 1970,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.699,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.019750379269216082
    },
    "sha256": "f8893fdd7f80493715a3d55172ae2f19f8434a4d38d1e8481ae9a28ab00358ba",
    "simhash": "1:384f3c9b43b3b0d9",
    "word_count": 323
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:32:58.211595+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ANDREW THOMAS HARTSELL v. INTEGON INDEMNITY CORPORATION"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Greene, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Moore County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with said dissenting opinion.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robbins May & Rich, L.L.P, by P. Wayne Robbins and Carol M. White, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Kitchin, Neal, Webb & Futrell, P.A., by Stephan R. Futrell, for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ANDREW THOMAS HARTSELL v. INTEGON INDEMNITY CORPORATION\nNo. 342A97\n(Filed 5 December 1997)\nInsurance \u00a7 472 (NCI4th)\u2014 leased vehicle \u2014 destruction by fire \u2014 payment to lessor as loss payee \u2014 claim by lessee\nThe trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff insured\u2019s claim against defendant insurer for the value of his leased vehicle which was stolen and destroyed by fire because the insurer paid the named loss payee, the lessor, the actual cash value of the vehicle where the policy provided that a loss was to be paid \u201cas interest may appear to [the insured] and the loss payee\u201d; after the loss plaintiff continued to make lease payments for the full duration of the lease; and the plaintiff is thus entitled to insurance proceeds to the extent of his interest in the vehicle as of the date of the loss.\nAm Jur 2d, Automobile Insurance \u00a7\u00a7 41, 42, 137-139.\nAutomobile property insurance-sole, unconditional, or absolute ownership clause. 71 ALR2d 223.\nWhat constitutes ownership of automobile within meaning of automobile insurance owner\u2019s policy. 36 ALR4th 7.\nAppeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 126 N.C. App. 511,485 S.E.2d 893 (1997), affirming an order entered by Johnson (E. Lynn), J., on 27 November 1995 in Superior Court, Moore County, which allowed defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss pursuant to N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Heard in the Supreme Court 17 November 1997.\nRobbins May & Rich, L.L.P, by P. Wayne Robbins and Carol M. White, for plaintiff-appellant.\nKitchin, Neal, Webb & Futrell, P.A., by Stephan R. Futrell, for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0385-01",
  "first_page_order": 425,
  "last_page_order": 426
}