{
  "id": 551084,
  "name": "MARSHALL v. SIZEMORE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Marshall v. Sizemore",
  "decision_date": "1998-02-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 570A97",
  "first_page": "577",
  "last_page": "577",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 N.C. 577"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "127 N.C.App. 751",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 288,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.723,
    "sha256": "0b1ebc2d7febb26b0380b1a76bcc89ce3d29b3d898656a6ad1ab77631916de2d",
    "simhash": "1:cbfea6ebffd9f416",
    "word_count": 49
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:32:58.211595+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MARSHALL v. SIZEMORE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1998.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARSHALL v. SIZEMORE\nNo. 570A97\nCase below: 127 N.C.App. 751"
  },
  "file_name": "0577-02",
  "first_page_order": 617,
  "last_page_order": 617
}