{
  "id": 551298,
  "name": "ANTONIA AYERS CRISP v. DARRELL CRISP",
  "name_abbreviation": "Crisp v. Crisp",
  "decision_date": "1998-03-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 323A97",
  "first_page": "659",
  "last_page": "659",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "347 N.C. 659"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "486 S.E.2d 485",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 N.C. App. 625",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11712381
      ],
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/126/0625-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 96,
    "char_count": 1011,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.698,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.019755205805434987
    },
    "sha256": "676e695851076c16028e7632e311aec19c7333dba18b48fb1e7ef5ad0b62d37f",
    "simhash": "1:259c36b214d3d4dd",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:32:58.211595+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ANTONIA AYERS CRISP v. DARRELL CRISP"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAs to the issue presented by defendant\u2019s appeal based on the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. As to the additional issues presented by this Court\u2019s having allowed plaintiff\u2019s petition for a writ of certiorari, we conclude that certiorari was improvidently allowed.\nAFFIRMED IN PART; CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Sutton & Edmonds, by John R. Sutton, for plaintiff",
      "Coward, Hicks & Siler, P.A., by William H. Coward, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ANTONIA AYERS CRISP v. DARRELL CRISP\nNo. 323A97\n(Filed 6 March 1998)\nAppeal of right by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 126 N.C. App. 625, 486 S.E.2d 485 (1997), affirming a judgment entered on 20 December 1995 by Bryant, J., in District Court, Graham County. On 2 October 1997 the Supreme Court allowed plaintiff\u2019s petition for a writ of certiorari to review additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 February 1998.\nSutton & Edmonds, by John R. Sutton, for plaintiff\nCoward, Hicks & Siler, P.A., by William H. Coward, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0659-01",
  "first_page_order": 699,
  "last_page_order": 699
}